Nicky said:
Be careful everyone, nothing is scarier than fire :x
I'd rather face a fire than my wife when she gets mad and start shakin'! :wink:
I was down south at that one yesterday and today. They were talking that it doubled in size when it went south. I visited with one of the land owners and they are talking anywhere from 40,000 to 60,000 acres burned. Just talk and it ain't offical.
There is an owner on the west side who just bought a big chunk and he wasn't running many cattle on it, saving it for wildlife so he can come and hunt (he lives out of state). He ain't got near as much feed left for the wildlife and several guys talked about huge bucks that came out of the burned area and headed for the unburned area(where this guy doesn't own any land) so maybe his plan didn't work out so well.
I was visiting with my yerarling guy this evening and he said they were looking at a ranch in Nebraska that a guy wanted to buy and just save it for wildlife and hunting, but the state wouldn't allow it as they wanted the forage at least partially grazed down, to slow up fires. I'd never heard of this before and if we have a law like this, I've never heard of it.
I hate to tell anyone what to do with their own property, but there might be some merit in making people who don't live in the area and who aren't going to be around to fight the fires on it, to at least have to come up with a certain size of a fire guard around it, so as to slow down these fires.
I hate any new laws, but when you have a big bunch of tinder and there is no one or only one guy on a huge property to protect and defend it from fires, it might be something to think about. There were sure a lot of people there the last 3 days working to save this guys feed. I hope he appreciates it. He has awful good neighbors, whether he knows it or not.