Ranchers.net Bull Session  
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search

Sarah Palin speech.... Opinion?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15889
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aplusmnt wrote:
Oldtimer wrote:


One Dem could- and can/will probably rip her throat out on the issues many women are most concerned with-- Hillary


Hillary could not even handle the black man from IL, what is his name?

Palin would eat Hillary's lunch, and I doubt the vary much in regards women's wants except Abortion, and personally I think abortion is over played as regards how many women are for it or at least put it as the forefront issue facing their gender.


Abortion rights, health care, pay equity, and worrys about their kids/grandkids spending 100 years tied up in foreign wars/Iraq top the womens lists...Polls show that between 50-60% of women do NOT want Roe v Wade overturned- and prefer the choice left to women..

I think, since most of the Hillary folks are now coming over to Obama, the Dems will use Hillary as the attack dog for Palin....

Interestingly on the Daly show last night they were reporting how the McCain group was complaining and whining about they thought Ms. Palin was being unfairly treated because she was a woman--
they then played a video of Palin a few months ago criticizing Hillary because of her and Bills whining of mistreatment because of her gender- and Palin said that when you run for national office you have to be a big girl and be able to handle the heat- and should be treated no different from a man....
Kind of ironic and hypocritical Laughing But they were having a major ball with the whole convention...


Back to top
don
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 953
Location: saskatchewan

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jon stewart also showed the video of o'reilly throwing a fit saying jamie lynn spears unplanned pregnancy was obviously her parents' fault but cutting palin all the slack in the world over bristol. there are so many flip flops on both sides on a daily basis it's ludicrous.


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15889
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don wrote:
jon stewart also showed the video of o'reilly throwing a fit saying jamie lynn spears unplanned pregnancy was obviously her parents' fault but cutting palin all the slack in the world over bristol. there are so many flip flops on both sides on a daily basis it's ludicrous.


Yep-don-- I saw that and got laughing so hard Grandma almost thought I was having the big one....

One of the reasons I can't follow the drumbeat of any of these cultist groups-- they're both jokes....


Back to top
RobertMac
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2527
Location: Mississippi, USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"the Daly show"
At least now we know where you get your news, OT!!! Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh

I don't think you have or will ever hear "Sarah Barracuda" whine!!!! Razz Shocked Laughing Cool


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 10119
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Grandma almost thought I was having the big one....


Poor gal. Bet she was disappointed......................... Shocked


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15889
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone got ahold of the acceptance speech written by Sarah Palin, before it got replaced by one written by one of Dubya’s ex-speechwriters:




Wink Laughing Laughing Razz


Back to top
Larrry
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 1281
Location: Utah and points east

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
worrys about their kids/grandkids spending 100 years tied up in foreign wars/Iraq top the womens lists


That is a BOLD FACED LIE OT John McCain has suggested he would be fine with an indefinite US troop presence in Iraq for 100 years or more "as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed" -- not a continued war for that long, but for a US troop presence there, the way the US continues to have troops in Japan more than 50 years after the end of World War II.


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15889
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Larrry wrote:
Quote:
worrys about their kids/grandkids spending 100 years tied up in foreign wars/Iraq top the womens lists


That is a BOLD FACED LIE OT John McCain has suggested he would be fine with an indefinite US troop presence in Iraq for 100 years or more "as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed" -- not a continued war for that long, but for a US troop presence there, the way the US continues to have troops in Japan more than 50 years after the end of World War II.


No lie-- after he said some of those stupid statements-- "100 years would be fine", "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran", his agreement we might need a draft to handle the wars we have going, and some of his other warmongerings many mothers/grandmothers on the blogs started questioning his rationality- his ability to conduct foreign policy- and what his Presidency would bring for their kids futures....


Back to top
Mike
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 10119
Location: Montgomery, Al

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer wrote:
Larrry wrote:
Quote:
worrys about their kids/grandkids spending 100 years tied up in foreign wars/Iraq top the womens lists


That is a BOLD FACED LIE OT John McCain has suggested he would be fine with an indefinite US troop presence in Iraq for 100 years or more "as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed" -- not a continued war for that long, but for a US troop presence there, the way the US continues to have troops in Japan more than 50 years after the end of World War II.


No lie-- after he said some of those stupid statements-- "100 years would be fine", "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran", his agreement we might need a draft to handle the wars we have going, and some of his other warmongerings many mothers/grandmothers on the blogs started questioning his rationality- his ability to conduct foreign policy- and what his Presidency would bring for their kids futures....


Yes you are a liar OT. Your presence here has become sickening. Mad

This is what...........about 20 lies in the past few days?

Your lies have gotten to the point that no one pays attention to you any more and have become accustomed to them....................


Back to top
leanin' H
Member
Member


Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 483
Location: Western Utah Desert

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So much for stating YOUR opinion and keeping things civil! Some of ya'll on both sides are worse than then Pro politicians.


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 15889
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Poll: Only 4 in 10 Say Palin Has Enough Experience

Friday, September 5, 2008 2:30 PM


Just four in 10 say Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin has enough experience to be president, while nearly two-thirds say so about Joe Biden, her Democratic counterpart, a poll showed Friday.


Views of Palin largely reflect partisan loyalty and show she's having little initial impact on which presidential ticket people support, the ABC News survey showed.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_poll/2008/09/05/128115.html


Back to top
VanC
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 395
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer wrote:
Quote:
Poll: Only 4 in 10 Say Palin Has Enough Experience


Friday, September 5, 2008 2:30 PM


Just four in 10 say Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin has enough experience to be president, while nearly two-thirds say so about Joe Biden, her Democratic counterpart, a poll showed Friday.


Views of Palin largely reflect partisan loyalty and show she's having little initial impact on which presidential ticket people support, the ABC News survey showed.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_poll/2008/09/05/128115.html



I've highlighted what I believe we REALLY need to keep an eye on. I think we need to take any poll with a grain of salt, but I also believe, for what it's worth, Rasmussen is the best out there right now. Besides, we all know that the only poll that matters will be taken on Nov. 4th.



Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Saturday, September 06, 2008 Email to a FriendAdvertisement
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Barack Obama attracting 46% of the vote while McCain earns 45%. When "leaners" are included, it’s Obama 49%, McCain 46% (see recent daily results). Tracking Poll results are released at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time each day and a FREE daily e-mail update is available.

Each Saturday morning, Rasmussen Reports reviews the key polls of the past week to learn What They Told Us.

Tracking Poll results are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, roughly two-thirds of the interviews were completed before McCain’s speech on Wednesday night. One third were completed before Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s speech on Wednesday. Tomorrow (Sunday) will be the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after Palin’s speech and Monday will be the first based entirely upon interviews conducted after McCain’s speech. By Tuesday or Wednesday, the overall impact of both political conventions should be fairly clear.

As McCain has begun to chip away as Obama’s convention bounce, most of his gains have come among women voters. Obama still leads 51% to 44% among women, but that seven-point edge is just half the fourteen point lead he enjoyed last Tuesday. McCain leads by three among men, little changed in recent days.

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of Obama voters now say they are voting with enthusiasm for their candidate while 17% are primarily voting against the other candidate. For McCain, those numbers are 65% and 28% respectively. Before the Republican convention, just 54% of McCain voters were voting enthusiastically for him rather than simply voting against Obama.

McCain is now viewed favorably by 58% of the nation’s voters while Obama earns positive reviews from 57% (see trends). McCain earns favorable reviews from 91% of Republicans while Obama is viewed favorably by 87% of Democrats. Among unaffiliated voters, McCain’s favorable ratings are at 64%, Obama’s at 54%. Premium Members can review demographic crosstabs and all the data we collect--not just the portion we make public. Premium Members can also get an advance look at tracking poll results via the Daily Snapshot each morning.

Palin is viewed favorably by 58% of voters including 40% with a Very Favorable opinion of her.

The Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power Calculator currently shows Obama leading in states with 193 Electoral College votes while McCain leads in states with 183 votes (see Quick Campaign Overview). When leaners are included, it’s Obama 264, McCain 247 (see 50-State Summary).

Data from Rasmussen Markets currently gives Obama a 57.5% chance of winning in November. Other key stats of Election 2008 can still be seen at Obama-McCain: By the Numbers. Sign up for a free daily e-mail update.

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 1,000 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 3,000 Likely Voters--is +/- 2 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for the full-week results are available for Premium Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large. Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. Our baseline targets are established based upon survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews). For September, the targets are 39.7% Democrat, 32.1% Republican, and 28.2% unaffiliated (see party trends and analysis). For the month of August, the targets were 40.6% Democrat, 31.6% Republican, and 27.8% unaffiliated.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2008 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours