Ranchers.net Bull Session  
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search

The Clintons pass in the night
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull
Author Message
Cal
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 2881
Location: Southern SD

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:49 pm    Post subject: The Clintons pass in the night Reply with quote

The Clintons pass in the night
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0306/morris.php3
By Dick Morris

Bill and Hillary Clinton are the first couple to appear simultaneously and independently on the national political stage. They are using their special circumstances as a convenient shield for one another, fulfilling, at once, Hillary's dream of no accountability and Bill's of being able to take both sides of an issue.


Did Hillary know that Bill was pardoning the FALN terrorists to help her win Puerto Rican votes in New York? Oh, she was opposed to the pardon.


Did Hillary find out that Bill was granting pardons to felons and drug dealers who had hired her brothers for six-figure fees to lobby her husband for pardons right under her nose? No way. In fact she was "saddened" at her brothers' involvement.


And we all know that Hillary was "gasping for breath" when she first learned the truth about Monica Lewinsky.


And the former first lady was "bewildered" that members of the White House staff would treat her demands that they fire the travel-office staff as an order.


Bill has been out there criticizing the war while Hillary plays to the center by voting for it.


And now, this heavy-footed pas de deux straddles the issue of whether a Dubai company should run six American ports.


Are we truly to believe Hillary's insistence last week that she knew nothing about Bill's counseling of his friend and benefactor the crown prince of Dubai, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum, on the ports deal? Do Bill and Hillary Clinton ever speak to each other, or do they just attend funerals, fundraisers and Billy Graham crusades together for photo-ops?


Bill is, after all, a regular in Dubai. The crown prince — that is, the government — contributed to his presidential library and pays him $300,000 per speech. Recently, Yucaipa, an American company that has Bill Clinton as a "senior adviser" and pays him a percentage of its profits, formed a partnership with the Dubai Investment Group to form DIGL Inc., a company dedicated to managing the sheik's personal investments.


No doubt Bill Clinton was brought in to cement this lucrative deal from which he — and therefore Hillary — will likely make millions. Neither Bill nor Hillary will disclose how much he is paid, but her Senate financial disclosure says that he will make "more than" $1,000. They also won't say how much Dubai royalty gave to the Clinton library.


So when Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) broke the story that the administration had approved the Dubai ports deal and Bill Clinton started to defend it in public, are we to believe that Hillary did not know that the sheik had called him to ask his advice, and are we to believe that Bill's defense of the deal was unrelated to his myriad financial ties to Dubai?


Hillary stands to gain millions in income from her husband's Dubai connection. She knows he flies there very, very frequently. And she must realize that Bill is close to the Dubai royal family.


So why did she dump on the port deal? Likely to cover herself. If she were anything less than front and center against the Dubai port deal, she would vulnerable to criticism over Bill's involvement with the Dubai royal family. So she held marathon press conferences denouncing the deal and professed not to realize her husband was defending the deal at the sheik's request.


What's really going on here is that Bill Clinton is trying to please his Arab patrons and business partners at the same time that Hillary Clinton is trying to capitalize on American stereotypes about Arab terrorists.


More important, she's desperately trying to distract attention from the Dubai dollars that flow into her family checking account from Bill's political and business dealings with the Dubai crown prince. What better way than to attack them?


We should insist that:


Bill Clinton register as an agent of a foreign principal.

The Clintons say how much he makes from Dubai.

The Clinton library tell us how much Dubai royalty gave to the library.

And Bill disclose, in the future, whenever he is speaking as an ex-president or as a paid public-relations flack.
Written in conjunction with Eileen McGann


Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4847
Location: East north east of Soapweed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is quite interesting.........


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5221
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gosh, now that we know that Bill Clinton was involved with the Dubai Ports deal, are we OPPOSED to it. But golly, GW is in favor and will in fact veto any Congressional bill that prevents Dubai Ports from taking over U.S. ports... What a conundrum. What to do? Who to support? What to believe? It's not all cut and dried. Yikes. Help Help I can't seem to think for myself. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4847
Location: East north east of Soapweed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's funny R2.....Throw dice? or darts??????


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5221
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

katrina wrote:
That's funny R2.....Throw dice? or darts??????


My point is that some issues must be viewed and judged on their merits, not on the partisan position or on blind acceptance of every decision of an administration. That is the fallacy that pervades Political Bull, that the world is divided into conservative and liberal and that each group behaves monolithically.

One can support some of GW's positions and actions and oppose others. Wow, what a concept. And GW and Clinton might be on the same side sometimes and gasp, you or I might not agree with their position/actions.

I opposed Dubai Ports from the beginning because it appears to me on first blush to fly in the face of the entire raison d'etre and workings of our national homeland security policy. I could care less whether GW or Slick Willy or BOTH were behind it.


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5221
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Reuters - Thu Mar 9, 8:24 AM ET

DUBAI - Dubai Ports is pressing ahead with a takeover that gives it control of six major U.S. ports despite a Congress committee vote to block the deal, sources familiar with the deal said on Thursday. Government and company officials in the United Arab Emirates declined comment on Wednesday's vote by U.S. lawmakers to block the deal on the grounds that handing the ports over to a Gulf Arab state-owned firm would threaten U.S. national security.


They know something Congress does not.


Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4847
Location: East north east of Soapweed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my gosh R2, I agree with you.....You are coming around to the conservitive side........ Good for you.......It's that bling, bling...... Wink Wink


Back to top
kolanuraven
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 7907
Location: planet earth

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill Clinton is a private citizen.....he can make as much or as little $$$$$ as he wants and the only people he needs to disclose that to is the IRS!


Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4847
Location: East north east of Soapweed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya right and we know he has no ethics or conscience. So screw the red, white and blue.


Back to top
kolanuraven
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 7907
Location: planet earth

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a fact....get mad if you want.

You don't have to tell us what you make....you're a private citizen and it's nobody's business to know such info.

Just because it's Bill Clinton...and he's a private citizen now...the same applys to him...like or not!

Don't get mad @ Clinton for the ports deal....that's Georgie's idea come hell or high water it seems


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5221
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

katrina wrote:
Oh my gosh R2, I agree with you.....You are coming around to the conservitive side........ Good for you.......It's that bling, bling...... Wink Wink


Now I am REALLY confused. The conservative position on this Dubai Ports deal is to SUPPORT it because afterall we support all of GW's actions. With few exceptions, the conservatives have come out in support of this on Political Bull with guns blazing, or have we forgotten???


Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4847
Location: East north east of Soapweed

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not from what I understand. Most big wig republicans are aginst it. If Bush signs it. They think congress can override the law. Bush knows something we don't and can not tell us because of security reasons. We can not afford to offend Dubai.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Political Bull All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2008 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours