|
| Author |
Message |
Cal Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 2881 Location: Southern SD
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: Ann's Oscar Predictions |
|
|
Speaking Truth to Dead Horses: My Oscar Predictions
by Ann Coulter
Posted Mar 01, 2006
This is my first annual Oscar predictions column, for which I am uniquely qualified by not having seen a single one of the movies nominated in any category. I've never even watched an Oscar ceremony, except once when a friend called me 35 minutes into Halle Berry's acceptance speech and I managed to catch only the last 20 minutes of it.
I shall grant my awards based on the same criteria Hollywood studio executives now use to green-light movies: political correctness. Also, judging by most of the nominees this year, the awards committee prefers movies that are wildly unpopular with audiences.
The box office numbers for this year's favorite, "Brokeback Mountain," are more jealously guarded than the nuclear codes in the president's black box. Hollywood liberals want the government to release everything we know about al-Zarqawi, but refuse to release the number of people who have seen "Brokeback Mountain."
I shall summarize the plots of the five movies nominated for best picture below:
-- "Brokeback Mountain" (gay)
-- "Capote" (death penalty with bonus gay lead)
-- "Crash" (racism)
-- "Good Night, and Good Luck" (McCarthyism)
-- "Munich" (Jew athletes at Munich had it coming)
Everyone says it's going to be "Crash," but I think "Crash" is too popular with filmgoers. Moreover, Hollywood feels it has done enough for the blacks. Hollywood can never do enough for the gays. Gays in the military, gays in the Texas Rangers, gays on the range. It's like a brokeback record! As Pat Buchanan said, homosexuality has gone from "the love that dare not speak its name" to "the love that won't shut up."
Is the idea of gay cowboys really that new? Didn't the Village People do that a couple of decades ago? Am I the only person who saw John Travolta in "Urban Cowboy"?
Movies with the same groundbreaking theme to come:
-- "Westward Homo!"
-- "The Magnificent, Fabulous Seven"
-- "Gunfight at the K-Y Corral"
-- "How West Hollywood Was Won"
OK, back to predictions. The best director award will go to ... Ang Lee, director of "Brokeback Mountain." (For analysis, see above.) Also, this is gays directed by an Asian, which should satisfy the gaysians. Hands down: Ang Lee.
The nominees for best actor in a leading role are:
-- Philip Seymour Hoffman, "Capote"
-- Terrence Howard, "Hustle & Flow"
-- Heath Ledger, "Brokeback Mountain"
-- Joaquin Phoenix, "Walk the Line"
-- David Strathairn, "Good Night, and Good Luck"
The winner in this category will be ... Philip Seymour Hoffman. The awards committee can't give everything to "Brokeback Mountain," and at least Truman Capote was gay (though not a cowboy). I personally would have chosen the lion in the Narnia movie, but he wasn't even nominated.
The nominees for best actress in a leading role are:
-- Judi Dench, "Mrs. Henderson Presents"
-- Felicity Huffman, "Transamerica"
-- Keira Knightley, "Pride & Prejudice"
-- Charlize Theron, "North Country"
-- Reese Witherspoon, "Walk the Line"
I gather Reese Witherspoon is very good in "Walk the Line," but that's irrelevant -- this is the Oscars! Felicity Huffman plays a pre-op transsexual in "Transamerica." That strikes a chord in Hollywood. It's not exactly gay, but close enough! I say Huffman wins.
For best actress in a supporting role, Rachel Weisz ought to win for "The Constant Gardener" because it's about how drug companies are evil, which to me is the essence of quality acting. Plus, English accent equals good acting. But Michelle Williams ("Brokeback Mountain") is engaged to Heath Ledger, who played a gay guy in "Brokeback Mountain." So I pick Weisz, with Williams as the dark-horse favorite.
The best original screenplay will be "Good Night, and Good Luck" as Hollywood's final tribute to the old Stalinists (Hollywood's version of "The Greatest Generation"). George Clooney has been mau-mauing the awards committee by going around boasting that conservatives have called him a "traitor," although I believe the precise term was "airhead."
Finally, my favorite category: best foreign language film. The nominees are:
-- "Don't Tell" (Italy)
-- "Joyeux Noel" (France)
-- "Paradise Now" (Palestine)
-- "Sophie Scholl" (Germany)
-- "Tsotsi" (South Africa)
After consulting with the Yale admissions committee, the awards committee will give the Oscar to ... "Paradise Now," a heartwarming story about Palestinian suicide bombers. How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs. It's Air Syria's featured in-flight movie this month -- go figure! I don't want to spoil the ending for you, but let's just say there won't be a sequel.
Normally, the smart money is on the Holocaust movie, so any other year, "Sophie Scholl" would have been the clear favorite. Unfortunately for the makers of "Sophie Scholl," their Holocaust movie came out the same year as a pro-terrorist movie, so they lose.
As a final prediction, for the second year, there will be no mention of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who was brutally murdered by an angry Muslim a little over a year ago on the streets of Amsterdam. (Now that's blacklisted!) I also predict this will be the lowest-rated Oscars ever. Remember to turn off your cell phones, no talking ... or sleeping.
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=12857&o=ANN001
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been reading Ranchers.net too long. I found this funny and even mostly on target. Hollywood thinks it sets the morals and interests for the rest of America and it's a bunch of shallow, self-centered, vain, and brutally aggressive folks. I did see Transamerica by the way and the acting was very good... Regardless of the topic and how you feel about it.
I agree 100% with her on the Palestinian film.
And on Hollywood getting BORING with always focusing in a predictable and simplistic way on the underdog of the hour.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Israelis ask Oscars to drop suicide bomb film
Reuters - Mar 01, 05:16
A group of Israelis who lost children to Palestinian suicide bombings appealed on Wednesday to organizers of next week's Academy Awards to disqualify a film exploring the reasoning behind such attacks.
The bereaved parents said they had gathered more than 32,000 signatures on a petition against the nomination in the best foreign film category of "Paradise Now," a drama about two West Bank friends recruited to blow themselves up in Tel Aviv.
The controversial film was made by an Israeli Arab director and actors working with a Palestinian crew and locations. The producer was a Jewish Israeli and the funding was European.
Yossi Zur, whose teenage son Asaf was killed in a bus bombing, accused the film of sympathetically portraying a tactic hailed by many Palestinians waging a 5-year-old uprising.
"What they call 'Paradise Now' we call 'hell now', each and every day," Zur told reporters. "It is a mission of the free world not to give such movies a prize."
Film industry experts said it was unheard of for an Oscar nomination to be withdrawn. This year's ceremony is on March 5.
Major Israeli cinema chains have shunned "Paradise Now," with distribution experts citing concern that its portrayal of suicide bombers could spell a low box-office turnout and even boycotts.
The film shows Palestinians bemoaning the travails of life under Israeli occupation, yet its characters also debate whether this warrants resorting to violence.
One of the protagonists takes on his deadly mission to exonerate guilt over a relative who spied for Israel, a comment on the complex pressures within Palestinian society.
Palestinians seeking independence in the West Bank and Gaza, which Israel captured in a 1967 war, won limited self-rule under interim accords that formed the Palestinian Authority. Some Jews opposed ceding the land, seeing it as their biblical birthright.
Fighting that erupted in 2000 and last month's victory in Palestinian elections of the Islamic militant group Hamas have dimmed hopes for peaceful two-state co-existence.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Cal Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 2881 Location: Southern SD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cal wrote: |
| reader (the Second) wrote: |
I've been reading Ranchers.net too long. I found this funny and even mostly on target. Hollywood thinks it sets the morals and interests for the rest of America and it's a bunch of shallow, self-centered, vain, and brutally aggressive folks. I did see Transamerica by the way and the acting was very good... Regardless of the topic and how you feel about it.
I agree 100% with her on the Palestinian film.
And on Hollywood getting BORING with always focusing in a predictable and simplistic way on the underdog of the hour. |
It's been such a pleasure watching you move to the right these last couple of years.  |
Don't hold your breath. I am a complex person because of some of the "different" experiences I have had, such as living in Israel, being attacked by terrorists, working Homeland Security, knowing people murdered by terrorists, being from NORTHERN California (those LA LA land people are known to be superficial types). I do have friends who are gay and having lost my husband I believe that everyone has a right to love, regardless of their different sexual orientation. There are great Republican leaders and revolting Democratic politicians (and vice versa). Normally I am quite disturbed by Ann Coulter but this was a funny, insightful article.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Cal Rancher

Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 2881 Location: Southern SD
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| R2, did you ever post about living in Israel (day to day life), or being attacked? Sound real interesting if you decide to share sometime. Thanks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cal wrote: |
| R2, did you ever post about living in Israel (day to day life), or being attacked? Sound real interesting if you decide to share sometime. Thanks. |
I'll do it sometime. In brief, I lived on two kibbutzim in 1969 -- one on the border with Jordan north of Eilat and the Red Sea. I had quite a few interesting agricultural and other experiences on the two kibbutzim. Then 1971 - 1973 I lived in Jerusalem where I was a regular student in Islamic History and Arabic. I also lived in Cairo in 1975.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|