|
| Author |
Message |
Northern Rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 7321 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:37 pm Post subject: I Ain'T da Man!!! |
|
|
| But my granddad was-my daughter was checking out some family history today-my grandad died in 1925 and I knew he was old when my Dad was born but I'd forgot how old-he was 70 and gramma was 33-I don't think I'll be topping my ancestor in that regard-remember no little blue pill back then just creek water and fresh air lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ranchwife Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 3994 Location: ennis, montana
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm 55 and cannot for the life of me imagine having little ones to raise.
My brother-in-law was 50 when his youngest was born. (Second wife.) He has grandchildren older than his daughter. In fact his daughter is close friend s with a "niece" her age. These older parents seem to not want to fight their young child so she pretty much gets her way...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MsSage Rancher

Joined: 27 Oct 2005 Posts: 1241 Location: NW Panhandle Texas
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree reader I am only 42 but there is NO WAY I would have another baby at this age. Geeshhhhh youngest is almost self sufficient. The only thing I am loking froward to now is grandkids.....well it better not be anytime SOON.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ranchwife Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 3994 Location: ennis, montana
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Northern Rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 7321 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well I'm sure the thought will cross my mind when I'm 70 but don't think my wife will be too receptive at age 68 lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5221 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
The thought of adopting crossed my mind when my husband was dying. I hate to sound selfish but I want time to travel with a boyfriend / spouse, take up new hobbies, sleep late, and so on. I was working and raising the kids for 25 years and I was an attentive parent.
My husband and I did everything with and for the kids and nothing for ourselves until only recently when they were nearly or out of the house. So I missed out on having couples time again like when we were young. I probably had 1 - 2 months of couples time before he was taken. Sad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
John SD Member

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 521 Location: western SD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
jigs Rancher

Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 4812 Location: KANSAS
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
both sets of my grandparents had 11 kids. dad is the oldest on his side, mom is next to last on her side.
on moms side counting from grandma on down( lost grandpa many years ago ) to the great great grandkids there are roughly 137 of us. depending on how you count the engaged, it spikes to 142.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Northern Rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 7321 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nobody knows exactly how many kids Grampa had-I don't think he was a dour Scott lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
CattleRMe Member

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 886 Location: Nebraska
|
|
| Back to top |
|
the_jersey_lilly_2000 Rancher

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 7408 Location: South East Texas
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| my grandma had her first in 1922 and her last in 1947, that's a span of 25 years!!!!! NO WAY!!!!!not me. she had 7 girls then the last one was a boy.....she didnt bleave em when they told her that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|