|
| Author |
Message |
Murgen Rancher

Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 2117 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OT-I would appreciate it if you just answer yes or no to these questions. A yes/no answer will be sufficient, you've probably heard that before. And I know you have respect for the basis that the US justice system/law was built. On truth and concise answers!
1) In your opinion are Canadian animals contaminatedwith BSE , ever since the feed ban in 1997? yes or no?
2) Have the number of Canadian animals in the US at any one time in the last 5 years, exceeded 1 million animals? Yes or No?
3) Are these animals not being culled at the same rate as Canadian older animals, yes or no?
4) Are they all being condemned? Yes or No?
Are the majority not being killed for human consumption, yes or no?
5) By your yes and no answers I will take that as you are stating that the US beef supply is not safe and that we as consumers should never eat beef again!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Oldtimer Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 16285 Location: Northeast Montana
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Murgen wrote: |
OT-I would appreciate it if you just answer yes or no to these questions. A yes/no answer will be sufficient, you've probably heard that before. And I know you have respect for the basis that the US justice system/law was built. On truth and concise answers!
1) In your opinion are Canadian animals contaminatedwith BSE , ever since the feed ban in 1997? yes or no?
2) Have the number of Canadian animals in the US at any one time in the last 5 years, exceeded 1 million animals? Yes or No?
3) Are these animals not being culled at the same rate as Canadian older animals, yes or no?
4) Are they all being condemned? Yes or No?
Are the majority not being killed for human consumption, yes or no?
5) By your yes and no answers I will take that as you are stating that the US beef supply is not safe and that we as consumers should never eat beef again! |
Murgen- like I've told the Judge on many occasions- this is not something that can be answered with yes and no answers- it requires explanation..
Canada by statistics and ratios has an extremely higher infection rate than the US- with cattle now showing up that were infected after the feedban... What is the extent of infection? For how long will exposed cows born after the feedban that are now just developing infection and showing symptoms keep appearing? No one knows because enough cows have not been tested and enough time to evaluate the situation has not been taken....Statistics show that with the number of positives found and the number of cattle Canada has that it is very possible that 10-15-20+ cases will still appear.....
As far as is Canadian beef safe?- you should read the BSE link that TH posted yesterday- the part concerning the infectivity of humans-- That it is unknown how much consumed infected meat it takes to infect a human- but that as the ratio of infected animals reaching the food system rises the rate of possibility of infection because the concentration of infected material rises- also the number of infected animals increase greatly the amount of persons exposed.... This is a question each individual has to answer for themselves... That is the reason consumers should be given the choice between buying a product of US origin or one from Canada....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2807 Location: Sask
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Murgen Rancher

Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 2117 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OT- all the questions I asked are answerable with a yes or no, even the opinion one, so I ask again will you enlighten us with your years of experience and knowledge? We value your opinion.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5162 Location: Northern Virginia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Murgen Rancher

Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 2117 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| reader- and Canada plans to continue to do that as far as we know! Who will be respected world side for their survelance? Canada I suspect. The announcement today of the US reducing testing will only hurt the US, I wouldn't be surprised if Japan rethinks it again!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Manitoba_Rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2118 Location: Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
reader (the Second) Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 5162 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Murgen wrote: |
| reader- and Canada plans to continue to do that as far as we know! Who will be respected world side for their survelance? Canada I suspect. The announcement today of the US reducing testing will only hurt the US, I wouldn't be surprised if Japan rethinks it again! |
Murgen - I have no axe to grind with either U.S. or Canada specifically. I belong to neither camp exclusively, nor R-CALF or NCBA. I want to see appropriate testing for both food safety and to regain the confidence of consumers -- abroad and at home. I want to eat beef knowing that we are following precautions per OIE guidelines. Europe has more experience. I have listened to a lot of briefings on TSEs in the last year and the European scientists and public health folks I have heard are facing the TSE issues square on, not playing with fire like I see the USDA and FDA doing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2807 Location: Sask
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tell me Sandhusker why is the US market still closed to Japan then If you can say that the Washington cow was imported. I thought that Japan is looking at restoring trade but only to animals under twenty months and they are not asking you to prove where they are from only the age. Looks to me as if they don't trust you older cattle any more that they trust ours right now. They are also asking Canada to age verify with birth date and we have a system we can do it with you don't so they have to agree to the tenderness test. That was the big stumbling block for you is how you can prove the age of the animals.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sandhusker Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 12271 Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tam wrote: |
| Tell me Sandhusker why is the US market still closed to Japan then If you can say that the Washington cow was imported. I thought that Japan is looking at restoring trade but only to animals under twenty months and they are not asking you to prove where they are from only the age. Looks to me as if they don't trust you older cattle any more that they trust ours right now. They are also asking Canada to age verify with birth date and we have a system we can do it with you don't so they have to agree to the tenderness test. That was the big stumbling block for you is how you can prove the age of the animals. |
Tam,
Japan is closed to us because they have a zero tolerance policy towards BSE. They're not taking chance one. You're right about us stumbling over age verification. The USDA, in their efforts to appease the big packers by standing in the way of free enterprise and value-added efforts of smaller packers via BSE testing, obligated us to a system that we do not have the infrastructure to support and one that leaves the Japanese veto power over any of our suggestions. The result, as could be foreseen by Ray Charles, is that we're not moving any beef and will not be in the forseeable future.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tam Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2807 Location: Sask
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sandhusker wrote: |
Japan is closed to us because they have a zero tolerance policy towards BSE. They're not taking chance one. . |
Thank you Sandhusker you just said that Japan is not willing to take a change on getting BSE from the US either. Why don't they trust your beef if your only case was imported as most US ranchers want to claim?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Manitoba_Rancher Rancher

Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 2118 Location: Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|