Ranchers.net Bull Session  
Log in Register Ranchers.net Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index FAQ Memberlist Search

R-Calf Gong Show
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session
Author Message
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OT-I would appreciate it if you just answer yes or no to these questions. A yes/no answer will be sufficient, you've probably heard that before. And I know you have respect for the basis that the US justice system/law was built. On truth and concise answers!

1) In your opinion are Canadian animals contaminatedwith BSE , ever since the feed ban in 1997? yes or no?

2) Have the number of Canadian animals in the US at any one time in the last 5 years, exceeded 1 million animals? Yes or No?

3) Are these animals not being culled at the same rate as Canadian older animals, yes or no?

4) Are they all being condemned? Yes or No?

Are the majority not being killed for human consumption, yes or no?

5) By your yes and no answers I will take that as you are stating that the US beef supply is not safe and that we as consumers should never eat beef again!


Back to top
Oldtimer
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 16285
Location: Northeast Montana

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Murgen wrote:
OT-I would appreciate it if you just answer yes or no to these questions. A yes/no answer will be sufficient, you've probably heard that before. And I know you have respect for the basis that the US justice system/law was built. On truth and concise answers!

1) In your opinion are Canadian animals contaminatedwith BSE , ever since the feed ban in 1997? yes or no?

2) Have the number of Canadian animals in the US at any one time in the last 5 years, exceeded 1 million animals? Yes or No?

3) Are these animals not being culled at the same rate as Canadian older animals, yes or no?

4) Are they all being condemned? Yes or No?

Are the majority not being killed for human consumption, yes or no?

5) By your yes and no answers I will take that as you are stating that the US beef supply is not safe and that we as consumers should never eat beef again!


Murgen- like I've told the Judge on many occasions- this is not something that can be answered with yes and no answers- it requires explanation..

Canada by statistics and ratios has an extremely higher infection rate than the US- with cattle now showing up that were infected after the feedban... What is the extent of infection? For how long will exposed cows born after the feedban that are now just developing infection and showing symptoms keep appearing? No one knows because enough cows have not been tested and enough time to evaluate the situation has not been taken....Statistics show that with the number of positives found and the number of cattle Canada has that it is very possible that 10-15-20+ cases will still appear.....

As far as is Canadian beef safe?- you should read the BSE link that TH posted yesterday- the part concerning the infectivity of humans-- That it is unknown how much consumed infected meat it takes to infect a human- but that as the ratio of infected animals reaching the food system rises the rate of possibility of infection because the concentration of infected material rises- also the number of infected animals increase greatly the amount of persons exposed.... This is a question each individual has to answer for themselves... That is the reason consumers should be given the choice between buying a product of US origin or one from Canada....


Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2807
Location: Sask

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldtimer can you tell me how many infected cows, besides the one we KNOW about, have entered the US food chain? Canada has had a no downer enters the food chain rule for a while now but the US just put that in place in 2004. How many of those downers that entered the US system had BSE and were never tested? When the US was to be testing for BSE why did they have a contract for a 1000 hd of the 20000 hd testing quota with a small slaughter house that did not accept DOWNER animals as a policy. Why don't they test the ones that actually show symtoms instead of the ones that don't. The Washington cow being tested was not the fluke if the USDA had a contract with that plant. It was a fluke that the test came back positive, to bad the USDA didn't see that non downers could also be positive. Canada was told that if we tested 30000 4D's we should get a true picture but if we decided to test healthy animals we would have to test 100 times as many. to get the same picture. Is the US testing 100 times as many animals for every healthy cow they test at a plant that doesn't accept downers? And why is the USDA still gathering samples from slaughter plants as they are not to accept downers as of Jan 2004 and that was what the OIE recommended they test was downers. Shouldn't they be gathering from farms and ranches like Canada is?

As far as the ones that do get into the system because they are not showing signs of BSE, that is why the rule to remove the SRM's was implimented in both the US and Canada. But I have read where this ban may not be fully complied in the US yet. As the SRM are not , by the plant inspectors say, being removed from all OTM animals. Maybe this will be like the Feed ban rule and the 99% compliance rate that you boost about. While the record shows it took the FDA over 6 years to achieve that 99% compliant rate and really don't have anyway of knowing for sure as they don't re-inspect plants that were found in non-compliance to see if they really did clean up their act. So tell me Oldtimer who is playing Russian Roulette with they consumers health. Say what?


Back to top
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OT- all the questions I asked are answerable with a yes or no, even the opinion one, so I ask again will you enlighten us with your years of experience and knowledge? We value your opinion.


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5162
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tam wrote:
Oldtimer can you tell me how many infected cows, besides the one we KNOW about, have entered the US food chain? Canada has had a no downer enters the food chain rule for a while now but the US just put that in place in 2004. How many of those downers that entered the US system had BSE and were never tested? When the US was to be testing for BSE why did they have a contract for a 1000 hd of the 20000 hd testing quota with a small slaughter house that did not accept DOWNER animals as a policy. Why don't they test the ones that actually show symtoms instead of the ones that don't. The Washington cow being tested was not the fluke if the USDA had a contract with that plant. It was a fluke that the test came back positive, to bad the USDA didn't see that non downers could also be positive. Canada was told that if we tested 30000 4D's we should get a true picture but if we decided to test healthy animals we would have to test 100 times as many. to get the same picture. Is the US testing 100 times as many animals for every healthy cow they test at a plant that doesn't accept downers? And why is the USDA still gathering samples from slaughter plants as they are not to accept downers as of Jan 2004 and that was what the OIE recommended they test was downers. Shouldn't they be gathering from farms and ranches like Canada is?

As far as the ones that do get into the system because they are not showing signs of BSE, that is why the rule to remove the SRM's was implimented in both the US and Canada. But I have read where this ban may not be fully complied in the US yet. As the SRM are not , by the plant inspectors say, being removed from all OTM animals. Maybe this will be like the Feed ban rule and the 99% compliance rate that you boost about. While the record shows it took the FDA over 6 years to achieve that 99% compliant rate and really don't have anyway of knowing for sure as they don't re-inspect plants that were found in non-compliance to see if they really did clean up their act. So tell me Oldtimer who is playing Russian Roulette with they consumers health. Say what?


The most interesting talk at the FDA TSE Advisory Committee last week was Sheila Bird from Cambridge Univ. talking about predictive analysis for TSEs. The point was LOOK AT THE HIGH RISK POPULATION to get a true picture of TSE prevalence. She showed how back calculations based on epidemiological/clinical cases always produced an underestimate. Tam is exactly right on. To understand the prevalence and the trend in BSE, the U.S. / Canada and Mexico for that matter need to test the HIGH RISK population for an extended period.


Back to top
Murgen
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 2117
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

reader- and Canada plans to continue to do that as far as we know! Who will be respected world side for their survelance? Canada I suspect. The announcement today of the US reducing testing will only hurt the US, I wouldn't be surprised if Japan rethinks it again!


Back to top
Manitoba_Rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2118
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have never seen anything definitive from Japan saying they would take Canadian beef or that they thought of this as "North American"... Last I saw from USDA was that they were not including Canadian beef in their trade talks- that they were were having to convince the trading partners of the ability for segregation again, like they did after the 2003 cow......

I truly believe our chances to open up our export market would be much better if we were not taking Canadian beef and/or Canadian beef had to be labeled as "Product of Canada" and not passed off as a US product.....





OLDTIMER: I beg to differ from you, There have been 3 meetings in the past 4 months in Brandon Manitoba with a few Japanese officials. They are looking at setting up an official plant here in Manitoba to process cattle from this province and ship back to japan through the port of Vancouver. The japanese have a lot of ties with Michael McCain and Maple Leaf has a large pork processing facility in Brandon and they looking to add a Beef processing plant. We have welcome arms for them to put up a plant here and I think you will see an announcement in the near future. Cowboy


Back to top
reader (the Second)
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 5162
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Murgen wrote:
reader- and Canada plans to continue to do that as far as we know! Who will be respected world side for their survelance? Canada I suspect. The announcement today of the US reducing testing will only hurt the US, I wouldn't be surprised if Japan rethinks it again!


Murgen - I have no axe to grind with either U.S. or Canada specifically. I belong to neither camp exclusively, nor R-CALF or NCBA. I want to see appropriate testing for both food safety and to regain the confidence of consumers -- abroad and at home. I want to eat beef knowing that we are following precautions per OIE guidelines. Europe has more experience. I have listened to a lot of briefings on TSEs in the last year and the European scientists and public health folks I have heard are facing the TSE issues square on, not playing with fire like I see the USDA and FDA doing.


Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2807
Location: Sask

PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tell me Sandhusker why is the US market still closed to Japan then If you can say that the Washington cow was imported. I thought that Japan is looking at restoring trade but only to animals under twenty months and they are not asking you to prove where they are from only the age. Looks to me as if they don't trust you older cattle any more that they trust ours right now. They are also asking Canada to age verify with birth date and we have a system we can do it with you don't so they have to agree to the tenderness test. That was the big stumbling block for you is how you can prove the age of the animals.


Back to top
Sandhusker
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12271
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tam wrote:
Tell me Sandhusker why is the US market still closed to Japan then If you can say that the Washington cow was imported. I thought that Japan is looking at restoring trade but only to animals under twenty months and they are not asking you to prove where they are from only the age. Looks to me as if they don't trust you older cattle any more that they trust ours right now. They are also asking Canada to age verify with birth date and we have a system we can do it with you don't so they have to agree to the tenderness test. That was the big stumbling block for you is how you can prove the age of the animals.


Tam,
Japan is closed to us because they have a zero tolerance policy towards BSE. They're not taking chance one. You're right about us stumbling over age verification. The USDA, in their efforts to appease the big packers by standing in the way of free enterprise and value-added efforts of smaller packers via BSE testing, obligated us to a system that we do not have the infrastructure to support and one that leaves the Japanese veto power over any of our suggestions. The result, as could be foreseen by Ray Charles, is that we're not moving any beef and will not be in the forseeable future.


Back to top
Tam
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2807
Location: Sask

PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sandhusker wrote:


Japan is closed to us because they have a zero tolerance policy towards BSE. They're not taking chance one. .



Thank you Sandhusker you just said that Japan is not willing to take a change on getting BSE from the US either. Why don't they trust your beef if your only case was imported as most US ranchers want to claim?


Back to top
Manitoba_Rancher
Rancher
Rancher


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2118
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the japanese are looking at investing in the cattle industry here in Canada thats alot more than the American s can say!!! Devil


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ranchers.net's Bull Session Forum Index -> Bull Session All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 




Powered by phpBB
Copyright © 2001-2008 Ranchers.net
All times are GMT - 6 Hours